Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Single-cell-resolved differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells into pancreatic duct-like organoids on a microwell chip

Nature Biomedical Engineering volume 5, pages 897–913 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Creating in vitro models of diseases of the pancreatic ductal compartment requires a comprehensive understanding of the developmental trajectories of pancreas-specific cell types. Here we report the single-cell characterization of the differentiation of pancreatic duct-like organoids (PDLOs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) on a microwell chip that facilitates the uniform aggregation and chemical induction of hiPSC-derived pancreatic progenitors. Using time-resolved single-cell transcriptional profiling and immunofluorescence imaging of the forming PDLOs, we identified differentiation routes from pancreatic progenitors through ductal intermediates to two types of mature duct-like cells and a few non-ductal cell types. PDLO subpopulations expressed either mucins or the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, and resembled human adult duct cells. We also used the chip to uncover ductal markers relevant to pancreatic carcinogenesis, and to establish PDLO co-cultures with stellate cells, which allowed for the study of epithelial–mesenchymal signalling. The PDLO microsystem could be used to establish patient-specific pancreatic duct models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Microwell chips for generating and culturing 3D cell aggregates.
Fig. 2: PDLO differentiation in the microwell chip.
Fig. 3: Apical-out polarity of the microwell chip-derived PDLOs switched upon orthotopic transplantation or embedding into Matrigel.
Fig. 4: scRNA-seq identifies cellular heterogeneity along the differentiation from pancreatic progenitors to PDLOs.
Fig. 5: Ductal subcluster-specific genes located within PLDOs and primary pancreas tissue on the protein level.
Fig. 6: Recovery of transcriptome dynamics predicts differentiation paths for duct-like cell types.
Fig. 7: Duct-like cells of the PDLOs clustered with primary ductal cells and resembled CFTR+-/mucin+-subpopulations.
Fig. 8: Potential PDAC biomarkers in the secretome and transcriptome of PDLOs.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Raw data, read counts and the analysed datasets from scRNA-seq can be accessed from the Gene Expression Omnibus repository using the accession code GSE162547. Mass spectrometry data have been deposited on the PRIDE database and can be accessed with the identifier PXD024461.

Code availability

The code for scRNA-seq analysis is available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4738625.

References

  1. Lee, M. G., Ohana, E., Park, H. W., Yang, D. & Muallem, S. Molecular mechanism of pancreatic and salivary gland fluid and HCO3 secretion. Physiol. Rev. 92, 39–74 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hohwieler, M. et al. Stem cell-derived organoids to model gastrointestinal facets of cystic fibrosis. United European Gastroenterol. J. 5, 609–624 (2017).

  3. Ferreira, R. M. M. et al. Duct- and acinar-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas show distinct tumor progression and marker expression. Cell Rep. 21, 966–978 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, J. M. et al. p53 mutations cooperate with oncogenic Kras to promote adenocarcinoma from pancreatic ductal cells. Oncogene 35, 4282–4288 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, A. Y. L. et al. Cell of origin affects tumour development and phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut 68, 487–498 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69, 7–34 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boj, S. F. et al. Organoid models of human and mouse ductal pancreatic cancer. Cell 160, 324–338 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huch, M. et al. Unlimited in vitro expansion of adult bi-potent pancreas progenitors through the Lgr5/R-spondin axis. EMBO J. 32, 2708–2721 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuveson, D. & Clevers, H. Cancer modeling meets human organoid technology. Science 364, 952–955 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frappart, P. O. et al. Pancreatic cancer-derived organoids—a disease modeling tool to predict drug response. United European Gastroenterol J. 8, 594–606 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tiriac, H. et al. Organoid profiling identifies common responders to chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Disco. 8, 1112–1129 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Georgakopoulos, N. et al. Long-term expansion, genomic stability and in vivo safety of adult human pancreas organoids. BMC Dev. Biol. 20, 4 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Boj, S. F. et al. Model organoids provide new research opportunities for ductal pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cell. Oncol. 3, e1014757 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hohwieler, M. et al. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived acinar/ductal organoids generate human pancreas upon orthotopic transplantation and allow disease modelling. Gut 66, 473–486 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, L. et al. Ductal pancreatic cancer modeling and drug screening using human pluripotent stem cell- and patient-derived tumor organoids. Nat. Med. 21, 1364–1371 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, Q. et al. A multipotent progenitor domain guides pancreatic organogenesis. Dev. Cell 13, 103–114 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Villani, V. et al. SOX9+/PTF1A+ cells define the tip progenitor cells of the human fetal pancreas of the second trimester. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 8, 1249–1264 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schaffer, A. E., Freude, K. K., Nelson, S. B. & Sander, M. Nkx6 transcription factors and Ptf1a function as antagonistic lineage determinants in multipotent pancreatic progenitors. Dev. Cell 18, 1022–1029 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jennings, R. E. et al. Development of the human pancreas from foregut to endocrine commitment. Diabetes 62, 3514–3522 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Breunig, M. et al. Modelling plasticity and dysplasia of pancreatic ductal organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1105–1124 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, L. et al. Commitment and oncogene-induced plasticity of human stem cell-derived pancreatic acinar and ductal organoids. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1090–1104 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. The Tabula Muris Consortium Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Enge, M. et al. Single-cell analysis of human pancreas reveals transcriptional signatures of aging and somatic mutation patterns. Cell 171, 321–330 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Baron, M. et al. A single-cell transcriptomic map of the human and mouse pancreas reveals inter- and intra-cell population structure. Cell Syst. 3, 346–360 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Muraro, M. J. et al. A single-cell transcriptome atlas of the human pancreas. Cell Syst. 3, 385–394 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Qadir, M. M. F. et al. Single-cell resolution analysis of the human pancreatic ductal progenitor cell niche. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10876–10887 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Segerstolpe, Å. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of human pancreatic islets in health and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 24, 593–607 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Y. J. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of the human endocrine pancreas. Diabetes 65, 3028–3038 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hwang, Y. S. et al. Microwell-mediated control of embryoid body size regulates embryonic stem cell fate via differential expression of WNT5a and WNT11. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 16978–16983 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Brandenberg, N. et al. High-throughput automated organoid culture via stem-cell aggregation in microcavity arrays. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 864–874 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Freyer, J. P. Role of necrosis in regulating the growth saturation of multicellular spheroids. Cancer Res. 48, 2432–2439 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Crisera, C. A. et al. Expression and role of laminin-1 in mouse pancreatic organogenesis. Diabetes 49, 936–944 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Miner, J. H. & Yurchenco, P. D. Laminin functions in tissue morphogenesis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 255–284 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang, F. X., Cram, D. S., DeAizpurua, H. J. & Harrison, L. C. Laminin-1 promotes differentiation of fetal mouse pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes 48, 722–730 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kopp, J. L. et al. Progenitor cell domains in the developing and adult pancreas. Cell Cycle 10, 1921–1927 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kopp, J. L. et al. Sox9+ ductal cells are multipotent progenitors throughout development but do not produce new endocrine cells in the normal or injured adult pancreas. Development 138, 653–665 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pan, F. C. & Wright, C. Pancreas organogenesis: from bud to plexus to gland. Dev. Dyn. 240, 530–565 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nair, G. & Hebrok, M. Islet formation in mice and men: lessons for the generation of functional insulin-producing β-cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 32, 171–180 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Inada, A., Nienaber, C., Fonseca, S. & Bonner-Weir, S. Timing and expression pattern of carbonic anhydrase II in pancreas. Dev. Dyn. 235, 1571–1577 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bergen, V., Lange, M., Peidli, S., Wolf, F. A. & Theis, F. J. Generalizing RNA velocity to transient cell states through dynamical modeling. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1408–1414 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. La Manno, G. et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 560, 494–498 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Puri, S., Folias, A. E. & Hebrok, M. Plasticity and dedifferentiation within the pancreas: development, homeostasis, and disease. Cell Stem Cell 16, 18–31 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. George, N. M., Day, C. E., Boerner, B. P., Johnson, R. L. & Sarvetnick, N. E. Hippo signaling regulates pancreas development through inactivation of Yap. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 5116–5128 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Qu, H. et al. Laminin 411 acts as a potent inducer of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into insulin-producing cells. J. Transl. Med. 12, 135 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mamidi, A. et al. Mechanosignalling via integrins directs fate decisions of pancreatic progenitors. Nature 564, 114–118 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cirulli, V. et al. Expression and function of αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins in the developing pancreas: roles in the adhesion and migration of putative endocrine progenitor cells. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1445–1460 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Erkan, M. et al. StellaTUM: current consensus and discussion on pancreatic stellate cell research. Gut 61, 172–178 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Uhlén, M. et al. The human secretome. Sci. Signal 12, eaaz0274 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Uhlen, M. et al. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science 357, eaan2507 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zubair, H. et al. Proteomic analysis of MYB-regulated secretome identifies functional pathways and biomarkers: potential pathobiological and clinical implications. J. Proteome Res. 19, 794–804 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Bandaru, S. et al. Targeting filamin B induces tumor growth and metastasis via enhanced activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and secretion of VEGF-A. Oncogenesis 3, e119 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Iguchi, Y. et al. Filamin B enhances the invasiveness of cancer cells into 3D collagen matrices. Cell Struct. Funct. 40, 61–67 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Surcel, A. et al. Targeting mechanoresponsive proteins in pancreatic cancer: 4-hydroxyacetophenone blocks dissemination and invasion by activating MYH14. Cancer Res. 79, 4665–4678 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Arnold, F. et al. RINT1 regulates SUMOylation and the DNA damage response to preserve cellular homeostasis in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 81, 1758–1774 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Feld, F. M. et al. GOT1/AST1 expression status as a prognostic biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 6, 4516–4526 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Schmid, S. J. et al. Absence of FLICE-inhibitory protein is a novel independent prognostic marker for very short survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 42, 1114–1119 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hirsch, F. R. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 3798–3807 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kleger, A., Perkhofer, L. & Seufferlein, T. Smarter drugs emerging in pancreatic cancer therapy. Ann. Oncol. 25, 1260–1270 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Reichert, M., Blume, K., Kleger, A., Hartmann, D. & von Figura, G. Developmental pathways direct pancreatic cancer initiation from its cellular origin. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 9298535 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hassid, B. G. et al. Absence of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia predicts poor survival after resection of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 43, 1073–1077 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Bremer, S. C. B. et al. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 in colorectal cancer development and progression. Digestion 102, 227–235 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Li, J. et al. An alternative splicing switch in FLNB promotes the mesenchymal cell state in human breast cancer. eLife 7, e37184 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Driehuis, E. et al. Pancreatic cancer organoids recapitulate disease and allow personalized drug screening. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 26580–26590 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Co, J. Y. et al. Controlling epithelial polarity: a human enteroid model for host–pathogen interactions. Cell Rep. 26, 2509–2520.e2504 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Veres, A. et al. Charting cellular identity during human in vitro β-cell differentiation. Nature 569, 368–373 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Krentz, N. A. J. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of mouse and hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors. Stem Cell Rep. 11, 1551–1564 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Petersen, M. B. K. et al. Single-cell gene expression analysis of a human ESC model of pancreatic endocrine development reveals different paths to β-cell differentiation. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 1246–1261 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang, J., Yuan, R., Zhu, X. & Ao, P. Adaptive landscape shaped by core endogenous network coordinates complex early progenitor fate commitments in embryonic pancreas. Sci. Rep. 10, 1112 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Chen, C. et al. Evidence of a developmental origin for β-cell heterogeneity using a dual lineage-tracing technology. Development 146, dev164913 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Larsen, H. L. et al. Stochastic priming and spatial cues orchestrate heterogeneous clonal contribution to mouse pancreas organogenesis. Nat. Commun. 8, 605 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Gitlin, L., Schulze, P. & Belder, D. Rapid replication of master structures by double casting with PDMS. Lab Chip 9, 3000–3002 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Nostro, M. C. et al. Efficient generation of NKX6-1+ pancreatic progenitors from multiple human pluripotent stem cell lines. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 591–604 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Mohammad Rezazadeh, F. et al. Fast free of acrylamide clearing tissue (FACT) for clearing, immunolabelling and three-dimensional imaging of partridge tissues. Microsc. Res. Tech. 81, 1374–1382 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. John, T., Liu, G. & Tsao, M. S. Overview of molecular testing in non-small-cell lung cancer: mutational analysis, gene copy number, protein expression and other biomarkers of EGFR for the prediction of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene 28, S14–S23 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Jesnowski, R. et al. Immortalization of pancreatic stellate cells as an in vitro model of pancreatic fibrosis: deactivation is induced by matrigel and N-acetylcysteine. Lab Invest. 85, 1276–1291 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Livnat-Levanon, N. et al. Reversible 26S proteasome disassembly upon mitochondrial stress. Cell Rep. 7, 1371–1380 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Uhlén, M. et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Raudvere, U. et al. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W191–w198 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Chen, E. Y. et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinf. 14, 128 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kuleshov, M. V. et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W90–W97 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Chen, E. Y. et al. Expression2Kinases: mRNA profiling linked to multiple upstream regulatory layers. Bioinformatics 28, 105–111 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Clarke, D. J. B. et al. eXpression2Kinases (X2K) Web: linking expression signatures to upstream cell signaling networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W171–W179 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Guillaumet-Adkins, A. et al. Single-cell transcriptome conservation in cryopreserved cells and tissues. Genome Biol. 18, 45 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Luecken, M. D. & Theis, F. J. Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8746 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp. 2008, P10008 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426 (2018).

  89. Bastidas-Ponce, A. et al. Comprehensive single cell mRNA profiling reveals a detailed roadmap for pancreatic endocrinogenesis. Development 146, dev173849 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Tenenbaum, D. KEGGREST: client-side REST access to KEGG. R package version 1.24.1 (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Helmholtz Pioneer Campus, the German Ministry of Education and Research (INDIMED-PancChip), the Baden-Württemberg Stiftung (project ExPoChip), ERC (Consolidator Grant Number 772646), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Sachbeihilfe KL 2544/7-1, KL 2544/1-2, KL 2544/5-1, GRK 2254/1 and 2, Heisenberg-Programm KL 2544/6-1, German Cancer Aid (Grant 111879), Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (supporting A.K. with an Excellence grant and M.H. with a First Application grant) and Bausteinprogramm of Ulm University (granted to M.H.). We thank NK-Optik for instrumental support. We thank M. Löhr (Karolinska Institute) for providing the human pancreatic stellate cells and T. Walzthöni for bioinformatics support provided at the Bioinformatics Core Facility, Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Sandra Wiedenmann, Markus Breunig.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Helmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany

    Sandra Wiedenmann, Tihomir Georgiev, Michel Moussus & Matthias Meier

  2. Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany

    Markus Breunig, Jessica Merkle, Lucas Schulte, Thomas Seufferlein, Meike Hohwieler & Alexander Kleger

  3. Research Unit Protein Science, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany

    Christine von Toerne & Stefanie M. Hauck

  4. Institute of Diabetes and Regeneration Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany

    Michael Sterr & Heiko Lickert

  5. German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany

    Michael Sterr & Heiko Lickert

  6. Institute of Stem Cell Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany

    Heiko Lickert

  7. School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Heiko Lickert & Matthias Meier

  8. Institute for Pathology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany

    Stephanie Ellen Weissinger & Peter Möller

Authors
  1. Sandra Wiedenmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Breunig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jessica Merkle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christine von Toerne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tihomir Georgiev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michel Moussus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lucas Schulte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thomas Seufferlein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Michael Sterr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Heiko Lickert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. Stephanie Ellen Weissinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. Peter Möller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. Stefanie M. Hauck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  14. Meike Hohwieler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  15. Alexander Kleger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  16. Matthias Meier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.W., M.B., M.H., A.K. and M. Meier designed the study. S.W. designed and produced the microwell chips, based on work from M. Moussus. S.W., M.B., J.M. and M.H. executed the biological experiments. S.W., M.B., M.H. and T.G. did the imaging and image analysis. S.W., M.S. and H.L. performed the scRNA-seq processing and S.W. did the analysis. C.v.T. and S.M.H. did the mass spectrometric measurements and data processing. S.E.W. and P.M. stained and evaluated the FLNB patient cohort. L.S. and T.S. took the serum samples of the PDAC patient cohort and M.H. performed the ELISA. S.W., M.B. and M. Meier analysed the MS/MS and FLNB screening results. M.H., A.K. and M. Meier received the funding and supervised the study. The manuscript was written by S.W., M.B., M.H., A.K. and M. Meier. All authors corrected and approved the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Meike Hohwieler, Alexander Kleger or Matthias Meier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary figures.

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Supplementary Dataset 1

Top 300 DEGs for the kinetic clusters in Fig. 4c.

Supplementary Dataset 2

Dynamical genes for Fig. 6f.

Supplementary Dataset 3

Top 300 DEGs for the Louvain clusters in Fig. 7a.

Supplementary Dataset 4

PDLO secretome and proteome.

Supplementary Dataset 5

Results of the ELISA FLNB screening corresponding to Fig. 8h.

Supplementary Dataset 6

Antibodies used for IHC/IF-p, ICC/IF and FC staining.

Supplementary Video 1

Live-cell imaging during PDLO differentiation from day 24 until day 31.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiedenmann, S., Breunig, M., Merkle, J. et al. Single-cell-resolved differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells into pancreatic duct-like organoids on a microwell chip. Nat Biomed Eng 5, 897–913 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00757-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00757-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer