Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Rows of cars line up as parents drive their children to school in the morning.
Rows of cars line up as parents drive their children to school in the morning. Photograph: Anja Riedmann/Alamy Stock Photo
Rows of cars line up as parents drive their children to school in the morning. Photograph: Anja Riedmann/Alamy Stock Photo

Fine motorists idling outside schools to cut air pollution, say health watchdogs

This article is more than 6 years old

New official guidance also backs planting trees, supporting cycling and encouraging take-up of electric vehicles to tackle crisis that causes 40,000 early deaths a year

Parents who leave their car engines running at the school gate should be fined in order to help tackle the air pollution crisis, according to England’s official health watchdogs.

New guidance from Public Health England (PHE) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) sets out a wide range of measures to cut air pollution, which is at illegal levels in almost 90% of urban areas.

The health experts say children and older people are most at risk from toxic air and so “no idling” zones should be used outside schools, care homes and hospitals. Westminster city council has already introduced £80 fines for drivers caught with idling engines. Other PHE and Nice recommendations include planting more pollution-absorbing trees and hedges, training motorists to drive smoothly and to keep their tyres pumped up, and supporting cycling and electric vehicles.

The health watchdogs also back “clean air zones” that charge or restrict polluting vehicles from entering town centres. The government’s own evidence shows this is the fastest way to cut pollution, but ministers have shied away from implementing zones, fearing a backlash from motorists.

Air pollution is estimated to cause 40,000 premature deaths a year in the UK, making it the biggest environmental killer. It also results in health costs of between £8.5bn and £18.6bn a year, according to PHE and Nice. The government’s plans to solve the pollution problem have twice been declared illegally poor and its latest plan in May was dismissed as “weak” and “woefully indequate”. Ministers are now being sued for a third time.

“Air pollution is a major risk to our health, and so far suggested measures have not managed to tackle the problem sufficiently,” said Prof Paul Lincoln, chair of the Nice guideline committee. “This guidance is based upon the best evidence available. It outlines a range of practical steps that local authorities can take, such as the implementation of no-idling zones, to reduce emissions and protect the public.”

Penny Woods, chief executive of the British Lung Foundation, said: “These guidelines bring into sharp focus the reality that air pollution is one of our most important public health issues. We welcome the recommendations to introduce no vehicle idling areas, which will help to protect the most vulnerable in our society.”

RAC roads policy spokesman Nick Lyes said: “We welcome the principle of no-idling zones, especially outside schools, hospitals and care homes. No-one should have to suffer dirty air as a result of a driver leaving their engine on unnecessarily. Sadly, many drivers don’t realise the harm they are causing by doing this.”

Healthcare professionals should play a role in tackling Britain’s air pollution problem too, said Prof Paul Cosford, director of health protection at PHE: “They can advise individuals, particularly those who are most vulnerable, on how to reduce the personal impact of air pollution – for example, by reducing strenuous activity when air pollution is high and by using less polluted routes in towns and cities.”

More on this story

More on this story

  • Revealed: government spent £370,000 losing air pollution legal battles

  • Air pollution is killing us. As a GP I welcome this new charge on drivers

  • London's £10 T-charge comes into effect in fight against toxic car fumes

  • London should lead in showing electric cars will not tackle air pollution

  • Government's air quality plan branded inadequate by city leaders

  • Britain flouting duty to protect citizens from toxic air pollution – UN

  • Electric cars are not the answer to air pollution, says top UK adviser

  • Cheshire East council admits air pollution data was falsified

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed